Was 9/11 an inside job?
Yes, in part, 9/11 was an inside job. There’s no way radicalized Islamists in the terrorist group, Al Qaeda, planned the attack in caves, and pulled it off without the collaboration of corrupt agents in the United States, along with intelligence agencies and assets from Israel, Saudi Arabia, Britain, and Pakistan.
What’s the motive? Why would they do this? Here are six reasons:
There is so much material on 9/11. I pieced together the most salient points proving that the official story of that fateful day in 2001 as documented by the 9/11 Commission Report, helmed by compromised, corrupt, ideologues is full of omissions, misdirection, and falsehoods. Not surprising since it was helmed by a bunch of compromised and corrupt people.
Here’s a great explanation of 9/11 by one of the top researchers on the topic, Ryan Dawson. Watch that 14 minute video and you’ll know more than most.
“The real conspiracy is they could have stopped 9/11 but they didn’t.” – Adam Fitzgerald
If you want to get a great history of Al Qaeda watch James Corbett’s three-part documentary. It shows that the West has been manipulating the Middle East for decades for geopolitical and political gain.
In modern history, it was Britain that shaped the Muslim world in the days of T.H. Lawrence. They knew how to manipulate different factions of Arabs to fight amongst themselves or use them as a cohesive faction to provide resistance against other Western powers. They created the nation of Saudi Arabia with a more radical sect of Muslims, the Wahabi, and then armed them.
They redrew the map of the Middle East with the Sykes-Picot agreement after World War I. They promised the Jews a homeland in Palestine with the Balfour Declaration. The region has been in chaos and turmoil ever since.
After World War II, the United States took over the manipulation. At that time the US became beholden to Israel giving the Jewish state billions of dollars annually and sending troops and sophisticated weaponry to fight their neighboring enemies.
Within this turmoil, they have also built up and trained radicalized fighting forces to destabilize regions and present an existential worldwide threat. Ryan Dawson compares these forces to the privateers of old. The Brits didn’t like Spain and considered them a threat to their empire. However, they did not want to go to war with them. Instead, they paid privateers to attack Spanish ships. Plausible deniability. These were pirates doing what they do on their initiative. There was no state sponsorship. Spain’s only recourse was to hang the privateers. Britain went through the motions of hunting pirates too, to help provide the perception of separation between them and the hijinx on the high seas.
The only trick is how to pay the privateers. The British government couldn’t very well add a line item in the national budget for pirates, I mean privateers. Instead, they ran a very lucrative illicit drug business to generate cash flow to pay for dark operations like attacking enemy ships with proxy forces.
Nothing has changed. The terrorists today are the pirates of the past.
The US funded, trained, and supported the Mujahideen to bolster the force fighting against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. It wasn’t as secretive as Britain funding pirates. Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, flew to Afghanistan and rallied the troops with “you’re on the right side of history and fighting for God” rhetoric.
President Ronald Reagan met with Mujahideen leadership in the White House, praising their bravery against Soviet troops.
The Mujahideen served its purpose in Afghanistan. After a decade-long conflict starting in 1979, the Soviets completed the withdrawal in 1989. Later that year the Soviet Union crumbled, causing even more death, disease, famine, and strife in the country and its satellites.
And, the world moved from the Cold War to the War on Terror.
What a convenient pivot. A region in turmoil. A growing faction of extremist radicalized Muslims saw their countries turned upside down.
In 1954, during Operation Susanna, Egyptian Jews staged multiple bombings in Cairo and Alexandria trying to blame it on the Egyptian regime and destabilize the Abdul Nasser government, and chill economic and military aid to the country.
It didn’t work, but intelligence agencies learned valuable lessons to refine their secret operations in the future. Israel has used false flags to manipulate perceptions ever since that operation.
The Gulf War in 1990-91, triggered by the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, provided even more reason for residents of the Middle East to hate the West, making it even more fertile ground for radicalization. The US, under George HW Bush, knew they needed to keep the Persian Gulf oil flowing, so they built a coalition of 30+ nations to intervene in the regional conflict.
Saddam Hussein, President of Iraq, went off script and displeased his handlers with the invasion of Kuwait. Invading Iran in 1980 was fine because it was on the U.S. hit list. But Kuwait was off limits because the West wanted Kuwaiti oil for themselves.
Surprisingly, President Bush launched a precision war with specific objectives, which included the UN resolution of returning the rule of Kuwait to Kuwaitis. They completed the job in five days. No protracted conflict. No stay-behind forces. It was a quick and pointed message to Hussein … no ad-libbing. Do what we tell you.
Hussein, a paid CIA asset, was too valuable in his position to depose. He had been a loyal soldier for the US since his attempted assassination of Iraqi Prime Minister Abd al-Karim Qasim, a target of the US for removing his nation from the anti-Soviet Baghdad Pact. He solidified his bona fides by perpetuating the war in Iran for eight years with aid from the United States, causing mass destruction and killing 1.7 million people from 1980 to 1988.
Operation Desert Storm was a message, but Hussein strayed again when he decided to stop conducting international trade in U.S. dollars in 2000. That was the final straw. Quickly he became enemy number one (or two behind Bin Laden) as the Neocons made tenuous connections between Iraq and 9/11.
The 8-year Iraq War started in 2003. The country is still suffering from the consequences of that debacle 20 years later.
They convicted Saddam of war crimes and hanged him in December 2006.
Message sent: do as we say. Do not seek sovereignty.
Look, Hussein wasn’t a good guy, but a bad guy that keeps a country together, for the most part, is better than some Western puppet inviting chaos.
The United States decided to bring these dirty dealings to the homeland starting with the first attack on the World Trade Center by Ramzi Yousef in 1993. Researchers have found all sorts of shady connections to intelligence agencies and Yousef and his uncle, Khalid Sheik Mohammed. Both freely immigrated to the US and cultivated suspicious ties with terror cells, while under the knowing and watchful eye of the NSA, CIA, and FBI.
Yousef had spent time in an al-Qaeda training camp in Afghanistan prior to moving to the United States. Al-Qaeda was the Mujahadeen under a new name.
After the 1993 WTC attack politicians like Joe Biden began crafting a version of the Patriot Act. They refined the legislation after the OKC bombing in 1995 to include homegrown domestic terrorism as well.
This piece of anti-constitutional legislation passed immediately after the events on September 11, 2001. Psychologically distressing violent events provided cover for a project hellbent on changing the fabric of American society.
Not every intelligence agency employee is aware of the full scope of operations and investigations. The government has certain macro objectives that can conflict with the work on the ground by dutiful rank and file, who actually want to do their jobs and keep the American people safe.
There are many examples of heroic agents flagging suspicious activity on the part of potential suspects and their fellow law enforcement colleagues. There were quite a few of these folks in the run-up and aftermath of 9/11, providing substantial evidence that intelligence agencies in the United States and abroad were aiding and abetting the Al Qaeda network.
Able Danger
Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer wrote about a military signals intelligence unit program launched in 1996 called Able Danger. Using data mining the group uncovered two of the three active Al Qaeda cells in the US, including one linked to Omar Abdel-Rahman, the Blind Sheik, and one headed by Mohamed Atta.
They ignored this intelligence. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and the 9/11 Commission said they never heard of Able Danger or these reports. That was a lie.
Robert Wright – Vulgar Betrayal
Robert Wright was an FBI Special Agent in the Chicago Division. In August 1995, he started work on exposing Middle East terror networks. He found that terrorist organizations were moving money in and out of the US to support terrorist activities.
The Operation, called Vulgar Betrayal, led to a 1998 seizure of $1.4 million of US funds “destined for terrorist activities” using the civil asset forfeiture laws. But, Wright’s work was abruptly stopped there.
His superiors at the FBI mucked up his work. They withheld information from him and refused to give him funding or equipment. They forbade him from arresting people, who were aiding and abetting terrorism in the US and abroad. And, they kept him from diving deeper into Saudi Arabia’s role in funding terrorism.
Unable to stop his investigation Wright’s superiors removed him from the operation in 2000.
“Knowing what I know, I can confidently say that until the investigative responsibilities for terrorism are removed from the FBI, I will not feel safe. The FBI has proven for the past decade it cannot identify and prevent acts of terrorism against the United States and its citizens at home and abroad. Even worse, there is virtually no effort on the part of the FBI’s international terrorism unit to neutralize known and suspected terrorists residing within the United States.” – Robert Wright
The FBI blocked Wright from publishing a manuscript about his experiences with Vulgar Betrayal, which he completed two days after the 9/11 attacks. In 2009 a judge ruled that Wright could publish his manuscript, Fatal Betrayals of the Intelligence Mission. [NOTE: I can’t find it available anywhere.]
Wright held a press conference with Judicial Watch talking about his experiences following money laundering supporting terrorist activities. He breaks down crying and apologizes to the 9/11 victims.
Whistleblowers
After the event whistleblowers started speaking out against shady things that went down in the government agencies they worked for.
Sibel Edmonds
Sibel Edmonds worked as a language specialist for the FBI starting in 2002. She was translating Turkish calls. She learned a lot of stuff about the military-industrial complex, and dirty, compromised politicians. She brought her findings to her managers, then to Congress, but the legislative body said it was unable to discuss her information because of retroactive classified status.
A key finding she made in relation to 9/11 was information the FBI collected while monitoring Turkish ambassadors and politicians. Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, and Richard Perle (top Neo-Conservatives) were talking about invading Iraq and dividing the country. The UK would take the south and the rest would go to the US. They were asking what Turkey required in exchange for allowing the attack of Iraq to launch on Turkish soil.
Brent Scowcroft was all for invading Iraq until his client’s conditions were not met by the Bush administration, and he turned against it. Now he’s remembered as a hero for being against the war. That wasn’t originally the case.
Edmonds also discovered that the CIA, Joint Special Operations Command, and the State Department were supporting al Qaeda in central Asia and the Balkans. They never said Al Qaeda. NATO planes were shipping lots of drugs and weapons.
Abbie Martin asked Edmonds this pointed question in an RT interview:
Martin: “Do you think intelligence was ignored or thwarted because they wanted 9/11 to happen?”
Edmonds: “Absolutely. Certain elements of our government purposefully ignored it and let it happen. They haven’t been held accountable. 9/11 commission or congressional inquiries – none of them went into these topics. A number of whistleblowers censured out of these investigations.”
Richard Clarke
Richard Clarke was the Chief Counter-Terror Advisor in the White House from 1998-2002. In October 2009 he gave a very telling interview with two documentarians.
He said he talked with CIA Director George Tenet nearly every day, and that Tenet knew everything about Al Qaeda. He also mentioned Cofer Black, the director of the CIA counter-terrorism center 1999-2002, and Richard Blee, Chief of the Bin Laden station.
They were all motivated and understood the Al Qaeda threat.
Clarke felt betrayed because he was never told about the information they had on two Al Qaeda operatives who had entered the United States and were staying at the Charles Hotel in Harvard Square using credit cards in their own names. They were there for 15-16 months, but the CIA didn’t share this information with the FBI.
Clarke speculates that these were CIA sources they were developing, and if they told the FBI they were in the United States, the FBI would have taken over because the US is their jurisdiction.
Clarke said they didn’t bring it up in a September 4, 2001 meeting with Bush Cabinet-level advisers about terrorism threats. Why wasn’t it mentioned? He has no doubt the FBI could have stopped them even at that late hour if the CIA shared their information.
“We, therefore, conclude there was a high-level decision in the CIA ordering people not to share that information. I think it would have to be made by the director.”
They’ve (Tenet, Black, and Blee) been through the Joint House Investigation Committee and the 9/11 Commission and it never came out.
“They got away with it.”
In a 2014 interview with Amy Goodman at Democracy Now, Clarke suggested a tribunal should try George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld for war crimes for their roles in attacking Iraq.
Susan Lindauer
Ex-CIA asset, Susan Lindauer, started speaking about her experiences connected to 9/11, 10 years after the event.
She was the chief CIA asset covering Iraq and Libya positioned as a back channel to deliver messages between Washington D.C. and Iraq.
Lindauer says that Saddam Hussein hated terrorism, particularly Islamic Jihadis. He was afraid that they would take power in Baghdad as the entire country of Iraq suffered under United States economic sanctions in the 1990s. He wanted to help the US keep an eye on these networks, so the terrorist wouldn’t become too powerful.
She recounts many messages back and forth demanding intelligence about terrorists flying planes into the World Trade Center in May 2001.
Iraq wanted to work with the United States so they could get out from under sanctions and get back to a normal way of life. They were willing to cooperate in anti-terrorism work and promised to buy one million US-made cars, and more, to show good faith in exchange for ending the sanctions which had killed over one million Iraqi children.
Lindauer notes that on August 2, 2001, the Senate approved the nomination of Robert Mueller as the head of the FBI. She added: “there is not one terrorist investigation this man hasn’t thrown,” including the OKC bombing and the Lockerbie Pan Am Flight 103 hijacking.
Lindauer wanted to keep the talks with Iraq flowing because they were going in a good direction, and a semblance of peace was imminent, but the military-industrial complex had different ideas to keep their revenue streams flowing. Her CIA handler told her not to go back to New York City because an attack was imminent. This was in the weeks leading up to 9/11.
After the events, she continued to speak about the things she witnessed at the CIA, which then accused her of being an unregistered Iraqi agent. They imprisoned Lindauer on a military base for a year with no charges and no hearing and then muzzled her for five years. Law enforcement said they were able to do this under the Patriot Act, which President George W. Bush signed into law on October 26, 2001.
Lindauer published a book about her experiences titled Extreme Prejudice.
Colleen Rowley
Colleen Rowley was an FBI agent for 21 years and an FBI division legal advisor for 12 years. In her position in Minneapolis, she was privy to the investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui, known as the 20th hijacker.
Rowley couldn’t believe how FBI HQ thwarted the Minneapolis Division investigation. After the events of 9/11, she wrote a memo to FBI director Robert Mueller.
She tells Mueller that his characterization before Congress and in the media that the FBI had no way of knowing or even conceptualizing terrorists hijackers flying planes into buildings is pure baloney. She says there were numerous red flags thrown up, including in her Minneapolis branch where agents were trying to get a warrant to search Zacarias Moussaoui’s computer, because they detected suspicious activity, including flight school attendance
She accuses the FBI headquarters of slow-rolling permission requests and throwing up roadblocks to a proper investigation (very common theme!). Rowley adds that HQ never shared that the Phoenix Division had “warned of Al Qaeda operatives in flight schools seeking flight training for terrorist purposes!” … this was in the famous Phoenix Memo.
Due to their investigation, the Minneapolis branch was able to arrest Moussaoui for an immigration violation on August 16, 2001, which more than likely kept him from participating in the deadly efforts of fellow terrorists on September 11.
On December 11, 2001, a federal grand jury indicted him for plotting to kill U.S. citizens in connection with 9/11. And, on May 4, 2006, he was sentenced to life in prison.
Kevin Ryan
Kevin Ryan was a site manager at Environmental Health Laboratories, which was a subsidiary of Underwriters Laboratories (UL) at the time. He tested consumer and industrial products for compliance with government safety standards.
UL provided fire resistance ratings for structural steel components to insure compliance with New York City building codes.
Ryan started to look closer at 9/11 after feeling uneasy about the US invasion of Iraq. He thought it was suspicious that NYC mayor Rudy Guliani shipped the steel from WTC to China immediately after the buildings collapsed, making it impossible to do a proper investigation.
John Skilling, the structural engineer responsible for designing the towers, actually said in 1993 that jet planes crashing into the buildings would not compromise the building structure.
He started to ask questions of higher-ups at UL about the WTC collapses, saying if their testing was correct, the buildings would not have come down as fast as they did. NIST assured him that they were investigating.
NIST launched a 3-year, $16 million study of the Twin Towers’ failures in 2002. Both NIST and UL determined that the prevailing “pancake” theory was incorrect. The floor assemblies where the planes crashed did not heat up, weaken, and crash onto the floor below it causing a chain reaction.
Ryan saw this conclusion and started to ask questions. Why is the “planes and pancake” theory still the official story? Why are we in Iraq?
No one at UL would help him get to the bottom of it, so he wrote to the director of NIST’s Twin Towers investigation, Frank Gayle. Things were not adding up. Gayle never responded. So, Ryan forwarded his email to David Griffin and Catherine Austin Fitts, who had just collaborated on a 9/11 book. He allowed Griffin to publish the letter on his website, which triggered a massive call volume to himself and UL.
The HR department at his company told him to ask Griffin to take down the post. Ryan refused, so they terminated him the following week.
Ryan spoke to James Corbett about the book he published in 2013 titled Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects.
William Rodriguez
William Rodriguez, a janitor at WTC, had a master key to the building. He heroically lead people out of the building until the very last minute. He was also a whistleblower, because he insists, like many other people, that there were explosions coming from the basement. This contradicts the official narrative that does not include non-plane explosions.
He said a few seconds after the basement explosion, a plane hit the North Tower.
Rodriguez also tells the story of Felipe David, who ran up from the sub-basement with the skin hanging off his face, because of an explosion in the floors below. Despite pressure from those pushing the official narrative, Rodriguez has not changed his story.
Scott Forbes
The weekend before there was an unprecedented power down of the buildings. It was down nearly the whole weekend. Scott Forbes, an IT specialist, recounts that authorities gave them three weeks’ notice to power down, which would take all their servers offline. No small thing with massive banking infrastructure housed in the towers.
During this time there was no security. All the doors were open and the security cameras were off. Guys in overalls with toolboxes and wheels of cables were working that weekend. The story was they were upgrading Internet cables.
Forbes worked overtime to get the servers back up and running, so he took the day off on September 11, 2001. He’s convinced the guys in overalls were installing explosives for the controlled demolition of the buildings.
There’s plenty of evidence that the towers came down by controlled demolition, including Rodriguez’s story above. Kevin Ryan made 9/11 research his life’s work after questioning NIST about its findings.
Those without an agenda found that planes hit the buildings, but explosives brought them down.
In August 2005, the City of New York released 12,000 pages of oral history from firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians after The New York Times sued them.
Dr. Graeme MacQueen studied these released pages and found that 118 out of the 503 interviewed mentioned explosions that came throughout the building and were not caused by the jets.
It would be remarkable that all three fell towers into their own footprint at free-fall speeds despite asymmetric damage from planes and falling debris. In fact, it would be impossible. The NIST pancake theory no longer holds water.
Former NIST employee, Peter Ketcham, worked for the company from 1997-2011. He did not work on the 9/11 investigation or reports, but in August 2016 he started researching it, including looking at the NIST reports, and documentaries providing alternative viewpoints. It became apparent to him that NIST was covering something up. He shared his thoughts in Europhysics News in late November 2016.
One of the oddest occurrences on a day of terroristic oddities was the free-fall collapse of WTC Building 7, a 47-floor structure, otherwise known as the Salomon Brothers Building.
The official narrative is that the building caught on fire in the corner of the building from falling debris coming from the Twin Towers. However, science debunks this claim. You can’t have a symmetric, fall in its own footprint, the collapse of a building that has lost integrity on one side. That makes no sense.
The Institute of Northern Engineering at the University of Alaska Fairbanks did a comprehensive structural reevaluation of the collapse of WTC 7. This was a serious, 4-year academic study led by J. Leroy Hulsey, Ph.D. prepared for the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and released in March 2020.
The abstract states:
“The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.”
In other words, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) lied. And the collapse of WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.
Many, including Dawson, believe that the destination for Flight 93, which went down in Shanksville, PA was WTC 7. It didn’t make it to its destination (there is speculation as to why), so they decided to “pull it” anyway. Because that was part of the plan.
Larry Silverstein admitted it was “pulled” in this interview.
How a building is ready to “pull” a controlled demolition at a moment’s notice is anybody’s guess.
The BBC got their reporting times mixed up as they mentioned on air that the building had already collapsed while it was still standing in the background of their broadcast. The reporter got taken off the air because of “technical difficulties.”
In the end, maybe it doesn’t even matter if it fell naturally after debris from Building 1 hit it and it caught fire for eight hours, or if Silverstein pulled it. Stories like building 7 can become a distraction, especially when stories about secret intelligence files and tons of gold stored in the building pop up. We have more than enough evidence to implicate intelligence agencies and governments in multiple crimes that have justified devastating reactive measures.
In the 5th Edition of his book 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, Webster Tarpley reported that there were 46 exercises, drills, and wargames, related to terrorist attacks by plane, leading up to and on the day of 9/11. He says there were 21 exercises and drills on the day, which caused massive confusion for security personnel and air traffic controllers wondering if the blips on their radar screens were real world or part of the drills.
“You do the drills, then flip it live. It gives you a lot of cover.” – Webster Tarpley
This created enough disorientation to help keep the military from responding in time to thwart the threats. Having drills at the same time and place as real events is a common theme in terrorist attacks despite how implausible the coincidence seems.
Tarpley says the Pentagon should have a coordination center that says, “No you can’t do all of these drills all at once … not on the same day.” This would keep our air defenses from vulnerable positions when 9/11 scenarios go down.
Tarpley talked with Kevin Barrett on August 24, 2011, about his updated book and related findings.
The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) wrote a paper titled Rebuilding America’s Defenses calling for a new Pearl Harbor to galvanize public sentiment against Muslim extremists and provide a reason for the United States military-industrial complex to terrorize the Middle East for the next two decades.
PNAC, a viper’s den of neo-conservative Zionist, psychopathic traitors, was unhappy with their inability to manipulate American foreign policymakers to aid in Israel’s nefarious plans for the Middle East. With all of their conventional propaganda and clandestine operations failing, they, instead, put together a plan to generate a new Pearl Harbor in order to justify launching a war in the Middle East.
According to Ryan Dawson, Israel was pulling the strings of PNAC and providing material support to move the 9/11 plan forward. Most of the members of PNAC are dual Israel-US citizens with Israel always coming first. A radicalized group of Muslims, Al Qaeda, were more than happy to lend support to strike a blow at the Great Satan, America.
PNAC publishes The Weekly Standard, funded primarily by the military-industrial complex (MIC), including Lockheed Martin. Dawson says that war profiteers can make money off any war, so why Iraq? Well, because the neocons in PNAC were doing the bidding of Israel. Syria was actually Israel’s prime target but they had to get Iraq out of the way first.
The group has actually put out a load of incendiary papers calling for war to enrich their pals and make strategic moves on the grand geopolitical chessboard. But, they could never get a real foothold in politics until George W. Bush became president. He swallowed all of their bullshit.
In his documentary, The Empire Unmasked, Dawson says that PNAC was the driving force behind all of the lies that got the US into war with Iraq post-9/11, including
They used their Zionist media connections to spread these lies far and wide.
They also infiltrated all levels of the government.
A secret office in the Pentagon, the Office of Special Plans, was delivering parallel intelligence reports to the executive branch without the knowledge of the State Department. Wayne White, the State Department’s principal Iraq analyst said he didn’t know about the low-profile group, run by PNAC stooge Doug Feith until 6-7 months before the war.
White said they had no professional standards but were getting much more attention than his team was getting for their intelligence products. White said the secret group wasn’t created because counter-terrorism wasn’t doing its job, rather policymakers didn’t like the answers the counter-terrorism team was giving them.
Former CIA agent Philip Giraldi talks about all the neocons in Bush’s administration, and Feith’s false WMD information used to justify invading Iraq, in this article about the latest war, Russia-Ukraine, spun up by these same people.
Dawson says that Rebuilding America’s Defenses PNAC paper is the prime example of malfeasance. It rehashes garbage from previous papers, but also adds that a catastrophe or crisis would be the only way to justify regime change in the Middle East. The paper also proposes developing biological warfare agents that target specific genotypes. Truly ghoulish and evil minds.
PNAC also got to the 9/11 Commission, which became an extension of its narrative of deception. The executive director of the 9/11 commission, Philip Zelikow, admitted in a speech in September 2002 that the United States invaded Iraq to eliminate a threat to Israel.
Aside from being the driving force of the neocons in PNAC, and pushing for conflict in the Middle East to destroy their enemies, Israel also played a major role in 9/11 with boots on the ground.
Mossad operatives in New York were celebrating immediately after a plane struck the first tower. Strange behavior.
They said they wanted a good view of the event so they could document it. These men were Israelis who worked for a moving company called Urban Moving Systems, owned by Dominik Suter, who went back to Israel shortly after 9/11.
Urban Moving Systems had three or four vans roaming the city on 9/11 which were full of explosives. Law enforcement pulled one over on the George Washington bridge.
U.S. Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division helped get the Dancing Israelis out of jail and sent them back to Israel.
There was also a group of Jewish students from Austria, which called itself Gelitin, that created a work of street art on the 91st floor of the north tower of the WTC.
They removed a window and installed a wooden balcony shortly before the attacks. They also set up a photo op where people stood in the window while team members took photos from a hovering helicopter.
Again, it could be a coincidence, but there are also photos in the B-Thing book, which documents the project, showing boxes marked with BB18, which happens to be the number for fuse holders for explosives. There are also odd sketches of people falling out of the building in the book.
The Boeing AA11 hit the North Tower between the 92nd and 98 floors. Did they plant additional explosives in the building? It’s an open question.
Further investigation revealed that the Dancing Israelis and the Israeli Art Students were spy rings for Israel. The Dancing Israelis were monitoring the hijackers on the East coast. The Israeli Art Students were monitoring the DEA and FBI to make sure they weren’t getting in the way of the crime of the century.
A DEA report detailing the Israeli spy network said that 140 Israeli spies were arrested in 2001 with 60 more arrested after September 11.
Zim American, an Israeli shipping company, broke a $50k lease to move out of the World Trade Center and relocate to Virginia one week before 9/11.
“In essence, the ‘9-11 truth movement’ was created prior to Sept. 11, 2001, as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli complicity. . . . The slogan ‘9-11 was an inside job’ was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever devised.” In milder terms, it is “controlled opposition”. – Victor Thorn from his book 9/11 made in Israel: The Plot Against America
Someone used Odigo, an Israeli messaging service, to warn Jews who worked in the WTC to stay away on 9/11.
Zionist billionaire Maurice “Hank” Greenberg controlled Kroll Incorporated, which provided security throughout the World Trade Center. His son, Jeffrey Greenberg became CEO of Marsh & McLennan in 1999. They occupied floors 93 to 100 in the North Tower, which is exactly where the American Airlines Boeing crashed.
The connections point to a bigger conspiracy. A chance to move explosives into place, and facilitate big insider trading gains.
Israel’s Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said 9/11 was good for Israel.
Except for an honest and brave few, most truther celebs don’t bring up Israel. Why? Because as Richard Gage said, it’s bad for the brand. Now, why would that be? Well, Israel has done a fantastic job of ingratiating itself to the near entirety of Congress, and to the evangelical right, and many, who call themselves conspiracy theorists or even anti-globalists. Calling Israel out offends a huge portion of the potential audience for his messages.
The US says Iran and Iraq are the sources of most of the terror networks in the world. Richard Labeviere in his book, Dollars for Terror: The United States and Islam makes the case that Saudi Arabia is the primary financial backer of extremist Muslim terror.
FBI Special Agent, Robert Wright of the Chicago Division discovered that Saudi Arabia was financing terrorism. His superiors did not like this line of inquiry because the Saudis are a US ally, so they shut him down.
Operation Encore, the FBI’s secret investigation, determined that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) provided material support for the religious “militant network that was created, funded directed, and supported by the KSA and its affiliated organizations and diplomatic personnel within the US.”
President Biden declassified and released the 130-page report in September 2021.
The report details that Prince Bandar bin Sultan al Saud was involved in funding militant Islamic organizations. People in the know called Prince Bandar “Bandar Bush” because of his close personal ties with President George H.W. Bush and his family.
James Corbett’s documentary 9/11 Trillions: Follow the Money is a great look at some of the shifty characters that made a lot of money on the terrorist events.
Larry Silverstein
In 1998 the Port Authority of New York decided to privatize the World Trade Center. They had owned and operated it since 1973. In July 2001, Larry Silverstein’s company Silverstein Properties, led a consortium of investors to lease buildings 4 and 5 (the Twin Towers) for $3.2 billion.
Silverstein Properties only put down $14 million of his own money. He doubled the amount of insurance from $1.5 to $3.55 billion. That amount of coverage was split amongst 25 dealers. I don’t find the insurance increase conspiratorial. It’s just over the lease price. The thing that stinks to high heaven is the timing of the sale, plus Silverstein’s close ties with sketchy Israeli leaders like Netanyahu (he called him every week), Yitzhak Rabin, Ariel Sharon, and Ehud Barak.
Silverstein was on the phone immediately after the attacks trying to get a $7.1 billion payout because he argued it was two separate attacks. In 2007 he got a $4.55 billion insurance settlement. He also sued United Airlines and American Airlines for $3.5 billion for negligence. The balls on this guy, huh?
$4.5 billion for three months of property ownership. Not bad. And very suspicious. It could be a coincidence, but how many coincidences can you have before it turns into a preponderance of evidence?
Insider Trading
On September 12, 2001, the SEC opened an investigation on grounds that an unknown group of traders had made millions betting against companies involved in the attacks. The investigation went nowhere.
Dylan Ratigan said: “This could very well be insider trading at the worst, most horrific, most evil use you’ve ever seen in your entire life.” He added: if it’s a coincidence it’s one of the most extraordinary coincidences in the history of mankind.
Investors purchased 2,000 put contracts (betting that the stock will go down) for United Airlines on Thursday before the attacks. This was 90x more contracts purchased than the previous three weeks combined. $180,000 turned in $2.4 million on the very unusual purchase.
There’s a similar story with American Airlines.
Between August 20 and September 10, 2001, put options on companies Morgan Stanley and Marsh & McLennan, both headquartered in WTC, ballooned. Both suffered devastating losses.
More from Corbett: “Between August 20th and September 10th, abnormally large spikes in put option activity appeared in trades involving dozens of different companies whose stocks plunged after the attack, including Boeing, Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Munich Re, and the AXA Group.”
Also, investors purchased 6x of the typical Raytheon stocks in the weeks leading up to the attack. Those shares increased 37% after 9/11, and they made big money throughout the Middle East wars.
The 9/11 Commission looked into this unusual trading but decided that because the primary institutional investor, who placed these trades, was not connected with Al Qaeda in any way, they couldn’t have had foreknowledge thus it wasn’t insider trading.
In an interview with Max Keiser, Jim Rickards said that somebody made a smaller informed trade prior to 9/11, then the hedge funds and institutional investors saw that and decided somebody knew something, so they made bigger bets … not on inside info, but on the market anomaly.
Keiser pushed back saying that Alex Brown, a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank, made sketchy trades. Cantor Fitzgerald then bought puts based on Brown’s trades. They were making money on insider information and tragedy, rather than blowing the whistle.
The aforementioned whistleblower Kevin Ryan confirmed Keiser’s theory about Alex Brown. He added that the four highest-volume suspect stocks traded pre-9/11 were American Airlines (AMR), United Airlines (UAL), Marsh & McLennan (MARSH), and Citigroup.
Both airlines had two airplanes crash that day. Marsh & McLennan (Marsh) officed in the North Tower exactly where Flight 11 impacted. Citigroup, the parent of Travelers Insurance, expected $500 million in claims.
3 academic papers concluded there was insider trading.
On September 6, 2001, Wirt Walker, CEO at Stratesec, purchased 56,000 shares of his company, which was a security systems contractor for WTC and Dulles Airport. The stock doubled in value from September 11 to September 17.
FBI cleared Walker, cousin of George Bush, of wrongdoing because they weren’t connected to terrorism. STRATESEC actually did have connections to al Qaeda. One director had a business partner, who had direct contact with Bin Laden.
Marvin Bush was a principal at SECURACOM/STRATESEC from 1993 to 2000. From 1996 to 2000 SECURACOM had an $8.3 million contract to upgrade the security system in the WTC. Did they prep the building with explosive wiring?
In 2008, former CIA agent Robert Baer made an off-handed comment to We Are Change activists. He said he knows a guy that went into his broker in San Diego on September 10 and asked to cash him out because it was going down tomorrow. As he’s walking away Baer says the brother of this man worked at the White House. Many think this pithy anecdote was talking about Marvin Bush. This lead was never pursued.
Top-notch 9/11 researcher Adam Fitzgerald says that you shouldn’t approach 9/11 with an “everything the government says is a lie” mentality. This is true of the 9/11 Commission and the report they produced. It’s an incomplete report, but not a totally false report. If you dogmatically believe there is not one ounce of truth then you twist yourself in knots trying to come up with alternative explanations for everything.
It’s worth reading the 9/11 Commission report, but do it with an incredulous attitude.
Compromised leadership guided the Commission to produce suspect work. It was a whitewash because Zionist Neocons with unsavory connections to the military-industrial complex took control. No one running the commission was looking for the truth about what happened on 9/11, they were looking for ways to further their agendas.
Phillip Zelikow, Executive Director of the commission, was well known for being a self-professed Zionist warmonger. In the book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, authors John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt accused Zelikow of calling for war with Iraq to protect Israeli interests. Zelikow publicly agreed with that assessment. Zelikow is also known for developing and pushing the preemptive war doctrine that Paul Wolfowitz authored in 2002 and sold to President Bush. Millions of Iraqis died because of this horrific policy.
Lee Hamilton co-chaired the commission. He was a partner with Dick Cheney and had deep ties to the CIA. Hamilton had a great deal of experience covering up for the National Security State, including extensive work with Iran-Contra.
Senator Max Cleland was on the commission but resigned in disgust, telling Democracy Now that the Commission was compromised and did not have full access to all the information. He added that the government knew a lot more about the terrorist prior to the event than they will ever admit to.
Cleland quoted Richard Clarke, who said that President Bush and his top advisors, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz, handled the problem terribly because they have an obsession with Iraq. They didn’t care about Al Qaeda, who had substantive culpability in the attacks. Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with it.
Bush’s first selection to head the committee was Henry Kissinger, but there was too much backlash. Opponents of this appointment asked to look at Kissinger’s conflicts of interest, which were legion, as he had a long list of Saudi clients.
Zelikow removed Donna Lesman from the Commission after she called out the shoddy investigation, including avoiding topics like the direct connections between the Saudi Arabian government and the 9/11 event.
Ryan Dawson sums it up: “The 9/11 Commission was an extension of the Project for a New American Century narrative of deception.”
Connecting Iraq to weapons of mass destruction to bolster the Neocon case in the court of public opinion for war in Iraq required many lies. Chemical weapons that could reach the UK in 45 minutes, anthrax attacks, and even nuclear weapons. There were reports that Iraq was procuring yellowcake uranium from Niger, and aluminum tubes to build centrifuges to enrich the uranium to build a nuke. Investigators debunked these claims well before the U.S. invaded Iraq.
Iraq did have chemical weapons and was on a course to try and build a nuclear arsenal (for deterrence against Israel), but as inspectors discovered, those projects had ceased and the weapons destroyed.
Anthrax
People don’t realize that the post-9/11 anthrax story was a crucial part of the narrative to justify invading Iraq. There was no evidence to connect Iraq with the attacks on 9/11, so they ginned up connections between the hijackers and Hussein.
Then they pulled off the anthrax attacks and blamed it on Iraq. Disgusting.
The Office of Special Plans pressured Colin Powell to declare that Saddam Hussein had biological weapons and the capability to produce more. In 2004, Powell said that his famous and deceptive speech at the UN General Assembly was a blot on his record. A big blot considering it was the driving force in getting the U.S. into the Iraq War where at least 500,000 people died.
Israeli security forces claimed that they saw a transfer of anthrax from Iraqis to Al-Qaeda (Mohammed Atta) at a meeting in Prague. Further investigations proved that Iraq didn’t have anthrax and there was never such a meeting in Prague.
The anthrax was US-made and military-grade. The targets of the anthrax attacks were Senator Patrick Leahy and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle. Both were against the Patriot Act. Leahy, as Judiciary Chair was in a position to block the legislation. Daschle was calling to investigate 9/11. They both received lethal spores through the mail.
On the other hand, Fox News and Judith Miller were both sent hoax anthrax. Both were big proponents of war. This made it look like there was no rhyme or reason for the anthrax attacks when really it was to pave the way for war in Iraq.
FBI knew this was a domestic attack by December 2001, but the Iraq lie persisted.
They eventually blamed Bruce Ivins for making anthrax in his lab. He died by suspicious suicide before his day in court. Later evidence proved that Ivins had nothing to do with the anthrax attacks.
Dr. Perry Mikesell was also a suspect and he too died by suspicious suicide.
Bin Laden – CIA Asset
The Bush Administration named Osama Bin Laden public enemy #1 by the Bush Administration only a few hours after the 9/11 attacks. How did they know this so soon?
Ironically, the CIA recruited Bin Laden during the Soviet-Afghanistan War to help run an Islamic operation against the Soviet Union and develop the Mujahideen. The U.S. intelligence agency kept plausible deniability in its training efforts of the Arab fighters by working through the Pakistan ISI as an intermediary.
He had also visited the US under the pseudonym Tim Osman to tour the U.S., including military bases, in search of political, monetary, and arms support.
He was within easy reach of United States personnel numerous times but was let go to serve his function as a perpetual bogeyman as they cooked up cases for Iraq and Afghanistan invasions.
Ptech Connections to Terror Financing
Why does a software company with ties to documented terrorist financiers have contracts with the top governmental agencies and entities in the US, including FBI, IRS, NATO, Air Force, USPS, the White House, Secret Service, and the House of Representatives?
Risk management consultant, Indira Singh, was looking for enterprise risk management software for JP Morgan post-9/11. Singh saw that Ptech had many impressive clients including intelligence agencies, so she asked them to demonstrate their software. During her due diligence, she discovered a Ptech connection to international terrorist financing. She did exhaustive research to make sure, then connected with the FBI in Boston to take up the case.
They refused and did not inform the other US government agencies that were contracting with Ptech and giving them access to their most sensitive systems.
In 2002, Operation Green Quest a multi-agency investigation raided Ptech offices because of their connection to designated global terrorist Yassin al-Qadi, who, it turns out, was Bin Laden’s chief money launderer.
Coincidentally, White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer announced that the company and its software were safe on the day of the raid.
Michael Chertoff tried to give the FBI complete control over the Green Quest operation. Many speculated Chertoff wanted to whitewash the findings.
Turns out they warned Ptech of the raid several weeks in advance. Unsurprisingly, nothing came of the raid.
The 9/11 Commission Report does not mention Ptech and its links to al-Qadi. Understandable once you discover that the co-chair of the Commission, Thomas Kean, made $24 million from a land deal with an al-Qadi venture called BMI.
Ptech was working on the connections between the FAA and NORAD networks on the morning of 9/11.
Singh learned that PTech was a CIA front company and their computer systems could control the most sensitive computer systems in the country. They rebranded to GoAgile in 2003, and Intelligile in 2009.
They were laundering mob-linked drug money for covert operations.
Beware the Kooks
When researching 9/11 and other conspiracies, don’t use speculation as evidence. And don’t ignore physical evidence and witness testimony.
Kooky theories with no basis in fact discredit the truth movement more than anything. Saying that a missile hit the Pentagon, that directed energy weapons brough down the WTC (the planes were holograms) directs researchers down neverending, and ultimately, unfruitful rabbit holes. These theories also exonerate parties that were guilty and require even more proof which isn’t there.
It also makes truthers sound crazy which is all normies need to shut off any critical thinking and settle on the official story.
And it causes in-fighting and irreparable harm to the truth movement triggering dissension and dissipation of the drive for truth and accountability.
Dawson has an interesting theory. There’s a continuum from spook to kook. The official story is the one promoted by the spooks ←————————–> and the way-out stories are those peddled by kooks (probably planted and nudged on by spooks). In between lies the truth. In between lies truth … all that is needed for an understanding of the big picture.
Interesting side note. Michael Hoffman writes about becoming addicted to the spectacle of conspiracy and constantly looking for the next high from an outrageous story. All the evil machinations of the cryptocracy (his world for the evil Cabal) become another form of entertainment, while nobody helps fix the problem. Consume. Get a dopamine hit and move to the next one. That’s the danger with kookspiracies. They cloud the truth and pave the way for criminals to continue to act with impunity unafraid of any consequences or people rising up to revolt and demand justice.
Occam’s razor process with 9/11 starts with the official report. Verify the facts and poke holes in the fiction. Bring the missing pieces to light. Do not weave an entirely new narrative. The official story—terrorists hijacked four planes and crashed them into the WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville—is correct. If you veer off course from there, you create a much more complicated scenario where thousands of people are complicit … airlines workers and passengers, eyewitnesses, etc., who must be silenced for decades. This isn’t realistic.
Some kooks take up wild theories with good faith and lazy reasoning. Others purposefully promote kook theories to muddy the waters and/or to take the spotlight off themselves or other groups.
Don’t be a kook. Vet all your information. Use critical thinking. Cross-check what you think you know with research done by very credible people like Ryan Dawson and Adam Fitzgerald. I actually disagree with some of their conclusions and accusations against other researchers, but they provide a very useful balance in the 9/11 truther movement.
A missile hit the Pentagon. Nope. They found plane debris and DNA from nearly all passengers. Also, the small missile-shaped hole you see is not the full picture. Water from fire hoses covers up the much bigger, plane-shaped hole. Also, there were many witnesses that saw a plane. Are they all lying? And, there is the story of Dick Cheney telling the military to stand down and not shoot the plane out of the sky as it approached. This is a very important piece of the puzzle. It implicates Cheney in the plot.
I don’t pay much attention to the theory that the perpetrators targeted that specific side of the Pentagon because it housed the accounting department, which held the paperwork for the missing $2.3 trillion that Rumsfeld mentioned. He wasn’t really saying the money was missing, rather it was not properly documented with specific expense codes.
Fake phone calls from Flight 93, which crashed in Shanksville, PA. They really had the technology to fake real-time phone calls to family members, who were convinced they were talking to loved ones. How is that possible? Most if not all of the calls were from air phones. It’s also not impossible to make cellphone calls from planes depending on how close you are to a tower or satellite.
People say it’s not realistic that the plane evaporated in Shanksville. They ask where the debris is. They say that big pieces of aircraft are recognizable after planes crash.
First, they found pieces of the plane, including engine fragments in surrounding areas like Indian Lake and New Baltimore.
Second, you’re going to have a much more powerful impact and explosion when the pilot isn’t taking measures to land a falling plane. Pilots dump fuel and try to land as safely as possible. With a hijacking gone wrong, there are 78,000 pounds of fuel in a plane going 580 MPH straight into the earth.
You also had many local witnesses. Are those people lying?
The hijackers couldn’t have made the maneuvers to fly into WTC and Pentagon. Fitzgerald says that amateurs on flight simulations successfully make the same maneuvers. The hijackers could have used autopilot to get near their targets, then turned autopilot off. You don’t have to be an expert pilot to crash. There is a vocal minority of flying experts that say amateurs could not have made those moves. However, 1000s say they could.
Books
Websites
Videos/Documentaries
More Links
Futurists, philosophers, and tech titans dissatisfied with temporal bodies and finite knowledge want to merge…
What is COINTELPRO? FBI operatives develop plans, facilitate logistics, fund operations, and provoke dupes into…
In his book, Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, Michael Collins…
The Talmud and interpretation of the voluminous works of the Jewish rabbis promote Jewish Supremacy,…
Twitter shit poster, Douglas Mackey aka Ricky Vaughn sentenced to 7 months in prison in…
Evangelical Christians perpetuate a faulty theological view called dispensationalism, which compels them to demand US…